• About
  • Disclaimer
  • Links
  • Market Wisdom
  • Practical Wisdom
  • Video/Audio Market Wisdom
  • Video/Audio Practical Wisdom

Zone of Competence

~ Dollars, Sense, and Probabilities.

Zone of Competence

Tag Archives: science

Is Climate Science Really Settled?

21 Sunday Sep 2014

Posted by JC in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Climate Change, science

There is an interesting op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by Steven Koonin, a physicist and undersecretary for science in the Energy Department during President Obama’s first term. He is not a Climate Change denier, yet he notes that much is unknown about Climate Change and that climate models are riddled with assumptions and guesswork, and not based simply on observations and physical laws.

While some parts of the models rely on well-tested physical laws, other parts involve technically informed estimation. Computer modeling of complex systems is as much an art as a science.

For instance, the latest IPCC report uses 55 different climate models. To say they aren’t on the same page is an understatement. They have a margin of error in describing the global average surface temperature of over 3 times the warming actually observed over the last century. Similar margins of error exist in the estimation of other basic climate features such as rainfall, feedbacks, climate sensitivity, the oceans, etc.

As a result, the models give widely varying descriptions of the climate’s inner workings. Since they disagree so markedly, no more than one of them can be right.

And let’s not forget the natural variability of climate. The models and modelers aren’t even close to untangling human influence and natural variability, and human influence is much smaller than natural variability. This explains the current 16 year observed pause in warming that none of the models predicted.

The IPCC Report versus the “Summary for Policy Makers”

Yet these doubts and concerns in the IPCC report are not contained in the political document, the “Summary for Policy Makers,” which animates the press and the left in their calls for punitive carbon taxes and other austerity measures. Such austerity measures resemble a penance for humanity, rather than a reasonable and exhaustive search for a cost-effective solution.

What Should We Do Now?

Still, Koonin doesn’t believe this is an excuse for inaction.

Society’s choices in the years ahead will necessarily be based on uncertain knowledge of future climates. That uncertainty need not be an excuse for inaction. There is well-justified prudence in accelerating the development of low-emissions technologies and in cost-effective energy-efficiency measures.

But climate strategies beyond such ‘no regrets’ efforts carry costs, risks and questions of effectiveness, so nonscientific factors inevitably enter the decision. These include our tolerance for risk and the priorities that we assign to economic development, poverty reduction, environmental quality, and intergenerational and geographical equity.

This gibes with my view that we should take reasonable steps, such as investing in technology to improve the efficiency of solar power, that will be beneficial in any case. Approaching the problem by investing in a technological Manhattan Project should allow us to solve the problem out of abundance, instead of the costly and punitive prescriptions for austerity through carbon taxes and such.

Post Climategate, Let’s Have an Honest Re-Opening of the Debate

This is where cost-benefit analysis, consideration of tradeoffs, and an honest political debate should enter the picture. So much of the scientific community seems to have discredited itself through Climategate, with their admitted attempts to “hide the decline” and with claims that “the science is settled,” that it will be difficult for them to backtrack.

They have compounded that error with Stalinist smears of any scientist that deviates from the orthodoxy. Whatever your views of the Climate Change issue, such witch-hunting and smears of those who disagree are hardly indicative of a scientific cast of mind.

We need other, more honest voices in the scientific community to rise and admit what science knows and what it doesn’t know. Then it should be left to the electorate to make priorities and decide what should be done as the science hopefully advances over the next decades.

In any case, the idea of scientists as some “high, priestly caste” (in Peter Robinson’s phrase) that should rule over the rest of us is deeply flawed. They have no expertise in economics, cost/benefit analysis, or determining societal priorities. The people should be educated honestly and trusted to decide their own fate. This, after all, is the way of democracy.

Despite the statements of numerous scientific societies, the scientific community cannot claim any special expertise in addressing issues related to humanity’s deepest goals and values. The political and diplomatic spheres are best suited to debating and resolving such questions, and misrepresenting the current state of climate science does nothing to advance that effort.

See Also:

The Scientific Method and Climate Change

Recent Posts

  • Climate Lunacy Continues Despite Inconvenient Truths
  • Reason in the Internet Age: How you can avoid getting stampeded into poor conclusions and buying into silly conspiracy theories
  • Climate Change is a Real Problem, but Current Renewable Energy Technologies Can’t Replace Fossil Fuels Without a Huge Nuclear Buildout. Because, Physics.
  • Larry Fink’s Convoluted & Coercive Solution to the Problems of Indexing
  • The Wisdom of Charlie Munger: You Have a Moral Duty To Be Rational and Reasonable, and To Eliminate Your Own Ignorance

Archives

  • October 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2019
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Zone of Competence
    • Join 28 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Zone of Competence
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar